.

From the CTA: "CTA To Challenge Illegal Acts By Clinton’s First Selectman"

A message from the Clinton Taxpayers Association

 

From the CTA:

When Willie Fritz announced at the end of the Board of Selectmen meeting on Wednesday, that he was unilaterally cancelling the Town meeting called for June 26, the school supporters cheered. “Does anyone care that this is against the law?” asks Pam Fritz, President of the Clinton Taxpayers Association (CTA).

Michael Wells on behalf of the Clinton Town Counsel stated clearly and unequivocally in his legal opinion letter dated June 11, 2012 to Willie Fritz (no relation to Pam Fritz), Clinton’s First Selectman, “that the petition as worded is valid” and that “The Board of Selectmen should schedule a special town meeting to consider this resolution.”

The First Selectman then proceeded to sign and to have the other four Selectmen sign the call to a Town Meeting for June 26. This was his legal duty and he complied.  But under unrelenting political pressure from a pro school group, he backtracked and circumvented the Town Counsel, the Board of Selectmen, State Statute and the Town Charter. “According to CTA’s attorney, what First Selectman Fritz did is plain and simple against the law,” relayed Ms. Fritz.

The issue of the Morgan school, the petition or the Town Meeting nowhere appeared on the agenda of this Selectman’s meeting.  As such, even raising it, outside of visitors’ comments, during the business of the meeting, violated the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Section 1-225 (d).

Mr. Fritz read an opinion of counsel from an attorney at Shipman and Goodwin, a firm the Board of Selectmen had never authorized him to engage and whose opinion without Town Counsel’s validation holds no standing.  How the First Selectman came by that opinion is a subject that the CTA will be investigating through an official FOIA request. There should be a letter of engagement or other related documents from either the Town of Clinton or the Board of Education.

The First Selectman has no authority to unilaterally overrule a legal notice that he and the other Selectmen signed and published. “The CTA will not surrender to these tactics so long as we have community’s moral and financial support,” explains Ms. Fritz, “The CTA has raised thousands of dollars that enabled us to engage legal counsel and to press our case and our cause, legally.  We are grateful to our generous and growing base of supporters who understand that a small contribution now can save them thousands in unnecessary taxes later.”

The First Selectman’s actions are expected to galvanize CTA supporters.  The CTA will continue to defend the legal right to protest Town business when it is not conducted legally and fairly.

--- the CTA

Jay June 24, 2012 at 12:27 AM
Too Late -
Art Kuever June 24, 2012 at 12:29 AM
Sorry Vin, there has already been a referendum on this issue. Everyone was given ample time and unless a person has been on another continent for the past 2 years, they have known that there was going to be a referendum on this building. The CTA and the various beach associations did their jobs and notified as many, if not all, in their groups multiple times. I believe that the CTA is upset by the vote and are using these summer residents as a scape goats. Even these residents are starting to get angry with that and it should stop. This should not be allowed back to referendum, the charter needs to be tightened up so this law is not subject to this misuse. Just because you can, doesn't mean you should. The first referendum was democracy, 4000 people came and voted. You will never get 100% of the vote and I am thinking that is what everyone wants, but a summer referendum at anytime on any subject would reduce the domicile vote and we are the ones that live with the decision, not just in taxes but in life.
Yankee1 June 24, 2012 at 01:51 AM
As quoted from the Clinton patch. "The First Selectman then proceeded to sign and to have the other four Selectmen sign the call to a Town Meeting for June 26. This was his legal duty and he complied. But under unrelenting political pressure from a pro school group, he backtracked and circumvented the Town Counsel, the Board of Selectmen, State Statute and the Town Charter. “According to CTA’s attorney, what First Selectman Fritz did is plain and simple against the law,” relayed Ms. Fritz." ...... "Mr. Fritz read an opinion of counsel from an attorney at Shipman and Goodwin, a firm the Board of Selectmen had never authorized him to engage and whose opinion without Town Counsel’s validation holds no standing. Am I missing something or is Mr. Fritz acting like a dictator? It would seem that Mr. Fritz needs to go back and read what he was elected to do. Represent ALL of the Town not just a vocal group. He needs to follow state law etc. What Mr. Fritz is doing is beyond common sense and above all common decency. He has gotten too powerful for his own good and needs to be replaced. Violating the Town Charter, State Law and getting a legal opinion from a Law firm he had no authorization to contact is just beyond all elements of democracy. Whether you agree with the issue of the new high school or not is not the issue. The issue is how can enlightened voters allow one person to just arbitrarily do what he or she wants? . We will not forget
tim June 24, 2012 at 12:21 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5n_wSInlVDA
tim June 24, 2012 at 12:33 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kg8dygVE1fA This is funny work as one guys not like mobs.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »