.
Feedback

Adopt a Hybrid Monetary and Economic System

To improve their automobiles, many manufacturers developed hybrid engines. To improve the operations of the U.S., the nation should develop a new hybrid monetary, funding, and economic system.

 

ADOPT A HYBRID MONETARY AND ECONOMIC SYSTEM. To improve their automobiles, many manufacturers developed hybrid engines. To improve the operations of the U.S., the nation should develop a new hybrid monetary, funding, and economic system.

The U.S. and the world are changing. New problems and dangers are arising. The nation needs to build its strengths. Tragically, however, the U.S. has an aging and outmoded nation-weakening monetary system. It is mathematically flawed and can not be balanced. It creates and needs both millions of bankruptcies and trillions of dollars of debts in order to  keep functioning, always imperfectly, toward ultimate collapse. Furthermore, that system can not be constructively improved, balanced, fixed, or made constructively viable by new fiscal procedures; that is, by new debt, tax, and budgeting procedures. A significant systemic change is urgently needed.

Under the hybrid system proposed in my book, particularly in Ch. 17, the nation could do much that it now can not readily do; that is, it could significantly increase production and jobs, improve many public services, execute a massive infrastructure program, and improve living conditions while, simultaneously, it reduces national and state debts and taxes. The word “hybrid,” was seldom mentioned in my book, but that is the type of system I was describing.

In a document entitled “TEN ACTIONS FOR BUILDING AND STRENGTHENING THE UNITED STATES,” Action #8 is this, “Create a National Economic Development Bank (Ch. 17) for issuing asset-based and debt-free money to underwrite a massive infrastructure program for the construction and modernization of public capital assets; thereby, directly or indirectly, the nation builds itself, reduces national and state debts and taxes, increases employment, neutralizes the adverse impact of the interest factor in national affairs, and also supports health, education, entitlements, and other worthy nation-building programs.”

Once that proposal is adopted, the nation would have a national hybrid monetary, funding, and economic system, part money oriented and debt-based and part economically oriented and asset-based. Production, employment, and growth in the asset-based sector would be limited primarily by the availability of domestic and imported resources; capital and consumer goods and services; the skills and abilities of the people, labor, and management; the quality of health, education, environmental, and social services; the commitment of the people; and the quality of national leadership at the top. Simultaneously, public debts could be reduced and money issued by the asset-based sector would help to reduce debts in the private sector.

The U.S. could then become a strategically more powerful, secure, and independent nation in our increasingly more complex and dangerous world by strengthening, building, and coordinating all national strengths: political, economic, geopolitical, diplomatic, social, and military. That has been a challenge for each society and nation throughout all history. ADOPT A HYBRID MONETARY AND ECONOMIC PROGRAM. MAKE THE U.S. GREAT AGAIN!

***********

(Please see my website www.buildusanow.com for more info about my book and for buying it as a paperback, ebook, Kindle, or Nook from Outskirtspress.com, Barnesandnoble.com, or Amazon.com. Also, please post your comments and send this message to others.       (11/3/12) 

THE MONETARISTS AND THE EVOLVING CRISIS
WAKE UP, AMERICANS; WE ARE LOSING OUR GREAT NATION   
William H. James, Ph.D., Author      www.buildusanow.com             

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from North Branford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Russ Best May 4, 2013 at 05:09 pm
Vincent: first..let me commend you for doing an excellent job! I have a couple thoughts I wouldRead More like to bounce off of you: 1. How about a proposal for property tax breaks for seniors? Pick an age..62 or 65. The majority of retirees are on fixed incomes, some of which are on the razors edge right now and are looking at having to move from the area even though they don't want to. Its a shame that people who have lived their whole lives here cannot afford to stay on for retirement. 2. The current property tax credit for veterans is $1000 and has been stuck there since the '60s if I'm not mistaken. It really doesn't amount to a hill of beans given current property values and needs a serious upgrade/higher value. As a combat veteran (Viet Nam) I would be really grateful if this could be improved.
Tom Scelfo April 29, 2013 at 09:40 pm
Vinny - you obviously understand both the problem and the solution. As a general rule, all ourRead More elected officials are intelligent people, so I just don't understand why the Majority party doesn't seem to "get it." Please keep focusing on the problem AND the solution. At some point in time, perhaps other elected officials will finally understand the problem we are in, and realize that we really need to get serious about fixing it. Thanks for your service to the Connecticut's tax payers!
Russ Best May 4, 2013 at 12:42 pm
Audrey: welcome to the world of state and town contracts, unions and piddly regs that must beRead More quibbled over. There are power plays between city and state civil engineers,etc.All this is done in the name of "progress"..something I had hoped to see slow down when I moved to Northford. Progess nearly always means ever escalating taxes and rules that eventually push out folks of lower income, turning it into yet another elitist Connecticut town. It's sad the town managers and council can't seem to put their foot down and reign in spending.
Audrey Fitting May 2, 2013 at 11:08 am
I agree, it seems as though they are more worried about putting in fake grass, and spindly trees,Read More and are not working fast at all. The beautiful center of our town has been ruined. I cannot see it ever looking good again. I think it is a bigger bottleneck than we had. Whoever they hired as an engineer should be ashamed to take any money. Very poor planning...or may be plans in the works. The two ugly houses we have to pass when we go from 139 towards RT 80, its sure ugly, and that dentist office should be to torn down. Give it up. We now have an ugly town center. The shopping center at Dairy Queen, is dying for stores, but who would move in? I wish I could move out of town. This is atrocious.
John Fontenault May 2, 2013 at 10:03 am
Other than some work being performed at the Notch Hill Road and Rte 80 intersection and some workRead More under the Tilcon Overpass there has been little to no activity for months. Other than the equipment needed in these two areas there is no longer any large equipment in the area. Clearly crews have picked up and moved on. Is there a funding issue? An updated schedule should be posted to the Town's Website so we can all understand what progress will be made this spring. Please comment if you have details.